PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — Oregon State Representative Alek Skarlatos, a former member of the Oregon National Guard, has voiced his support for the deployment of troops in Portland, saying he believes the move is necessary to restore order amid rising tensions between federal and local authorities.
In an exclusive interview on Your Voice, Your Vote, Skarlatos, a Republican representing southern Oregon, defended President Donald Trump’s decision to send National Guard members into the city. He argued that the deployment is not an act of aggression, but rather a step toward ensuring public safety and protecting federal property.
“As someone who served in the Guard, I understand the role these troops play,” Skarlatos said. “They’re not there to intimidate peaceful protesters — they’re there to maintain peace and stop the small number of people who are causing real destruction.”
Also Read
A Former Soldier’s Perspective
Before entering politics, Skarlatos served in the Oregon National Guard and gained national recognition in 2015 for helping to stop a terrorist attack on a Paris-bound train. His military background has shaped much of his approach to public service and his stance on law enforcement and public safety issues.
“I’ve worn that uniform,” he said. “I know the kind of discipline and restraint these service members bring to the job. The vast majority of them are Oregonians who care deeply about their communities.”
Skarlatos said he sympathizes with the frustrations of Portland residents who want peaceful demonstrations but also want to see an end to ongoing vandalism and violent clashes that have plagued parts of the city in recent years.
Balancing Security and Civil Rights
While acknowledging concerns raised by Governor Tina Kotek and other state leaders who oppose the deployment, Skarlatos insisted that the presence of the National Guard does not undermine Oregon’s autonomy. “This isn’t about politics — it’s about safety,” he said. “Local and federal leaders should be working together, not fighting each other in court.”
Skarlatos also pushed back on criticism that the troop presence could escalate tensions. “People have a right to protest, absolutely,” he said. “But that right doesn’t extend to setting fires, looting, or attacking police officers. The Guard is there to prevent that — nothing more.”
Looking Ahead
The deployment remains controversial, with Oregon officials pursuing legal action to block it. Still, Skarlatos believes the situation requires practical solutions rather than political posturing. “We need to focus on rebuilding trust and restoring order,” he said. “At the end of the day, everyone wants a safe Portland — we just disagree on how to get there.”
As the legal and political battles continue, Skarlatos’ position underscores the divide between Oregon’s leadership and its federal counterparts — a debate over security, sovereignty, and what it means to keep peace in the Rose City.
